The Herald Bulletin

Evening Update

Anderson Annexation

March 9, 2013

Anderson annexation: Question one

What impact would annexation have on the Mallard Lake landfill?

ANDERSON, Ind. — In all of Madison County during the past 33 years, there isn’t a more contested piece of ground than the 254-acre Mallard Lake property on which the late Ralph Reed wanted to build a landfill.

Before he died last year at age 84, Reed liked to say he’d won every legal challenge — there were 15 lawsuits in all.

If ever there was a hollow victory, those legal successes would be it. Construction has never started.

Still, the Reed family holds a valid permit from the Indiana Department of Environmental Management — good until 2015 — to build a landfill, according to Bruce Palin, assistant commissioner, Office of Land Quality.

While that permit exists, Bill Kutschera and other members of the Killbuck Concerned Citizens Association can’t and won’t let down their guard.

“The place where we are at right now is very much where we’ve been for a number of years,” said Larry Whitham, a lawyer who represents the association.

Despite the valid permit from IDEM, if Reed’s surviving family or someone else wants to pursue the landfill, they would have to obtain an Improvement Location Permit from the county before construction could begin.

“I believe there substantial problems with their ability to get an ILP approved,” Whitham said.

Now, they have a new ally in their fight. Anderson Mayor Kevin Smith.

Smith says he’s long opposed the landfill. Mallard Lake is part of the four-square-mile patch on the city’s northeast side that Smith wants Anderson to annex. If the annexation is approved, the city would be in a position to oppose the landfill in court.

Smith characterizes his opposition as a moral imperative. A landfill on the property would pose a risk of contaminating Killbuck Creek and nearby Ranney and Elder Street wells, which are two of Anderson’s primary sources of water, according to the mayor.

And any future environmental cleanup would be far more costly than annexation, Smith added. “I think it’s important to address now for what may take place in the future.”

When William Anderson, now a retired family physician, bought a house in the 3400 block of Madison County Road East 200 North 15 years ago, the goal was to find a quiet country setting. He didn’t know anything about a proposed landfill.

It wasn’t long before he found out, though, and he’s a staunch opponent. But Anderson said he doesn’t see much benefit to annexation.

“We’re not on city water,” he pointed out. “We’re not on city sewer, and our fire department is volunteers from Chesterfield. We wanted to get away from the city and get out in country where it’s nice and quiet. If I believed the annexation would make the landfill go away, I’d support it. It would be worth it. As it is, the thing just seems to be grinding away.”

The Reed family’s plans are unclear.

Ralph’s widow, Kay Reed, and son, R. Jeffrey Reed, could not be reached for comment. And both the family’s local attorney, Ronald K. Fowler, and Indianapolis lawyer John Ketcham did not return phone calls seeking comment.

When local businessman Ward Stilson sold the Mallard Lake property to Reed in 1979, the idea was to earn more money for the Stilson family trust.

Things didn’t work out as planned.

Although he wouldn’t divulge an exact number, Thomas Gunn, trustee of the Stilson trust, said the Reed family owes the trust several million dollars. He said the land is for sale as agricultural property or for development as a landfill, but he would not say whether any offers are pending.

Although JM Corporation, which Reed formed years ago, technically holds deed to the property, two family trusts are the first creditors in line from sale proceeds.

“My personal preference, not speaking as trustee, is to resolve this as soon as possible and have the money that’s been owed to us paid back,” he said, speaking from his home in Grand Rapids, Mich. “We’ve definitely taken the long view on this, that’s for sure.”

Find Stu Hirsch on Facebook and @StuHirsch on Twitter, or call 640-4861.

1
Text Only
Anderson Annexation
  • Pendleton holding annexation meeting

    A public meeting will be held Friday night in Pendleton to discuss possible annexation of land near exit 214 on I-69, making the town the fourth entity in the last year to express interest in the property.

    February 20, 2014

  • NWS - HB0208 - city annexation - JC 3.jpg Council majority shuns latest annexation discussion

    A special meeting of the City Council called by Mayor Kevin Smith to consider a revised annexation proposal failed for lack of a quorum Thursday, a result that may have ended the mayor's is effort to extend Anderson's boundaries down Interstate 69.

    June 21, 2013 1 Photo

  • Anderson mayor says southwest annexation back on the table Mayor Kevin Smith plans to resurrect the so-called southwest annexation that was part of an annexation plan rejected last winter by Anderson City Council.

    June 18, 2013

  • NWS - HB0222 - Lapel - JC 1.jpg Lapel officials move forward with super-voluntary annexation

    The Anderson City Council killed Anderson Fast Forward last month, but a proposed super-voluntary annexation designed to keep Anderson at bay is moving ahead.

    April 4, 2013 1 Photo

  • NWS - HB0315 - city council - 31 - DK.JPG Council members: Annexation failure could foster cooperation

    In the end, there was probably little chance Mayor Kevin Smith’s expansive Anderson Fast Forward annexation proposals would be approved. They were large, complex, costly and controversial from the outset. Thursday night, the City Council rejected both plans.

    March 16, 2013 1 Photo

  • NWS - HB0315 - city council - 31 - DK.JPG Council votes down annexation efforts

    The Anderson City Council on Thursday night rejected Mayor Kevin Smith’s Anderson Fast Forward Annexation proposals. The vote on the proposed northeast annexation was 7-2; the vote on the proposed southwest annexation was 6-3.

    March 14, 2013 3 Photos

  • NWS - HB0208 - city annexation - JC 1.jpg City Council could decide annexation questions tonight

    There has been a month of intense public discussion about Anderson Fast Forward, Mayor Kevin Smith’s proposal to annex nearly 21 square miles of new land into the city. Tonight, the question of how, or whether, to move forward with that plan once again falls on the shoulders of nine members of the Anderson City Council.

    March 13, 2013 1 Photo

  • William-Anderson---Stop-Dump-sign-3a-crop.jpg Anderson annexation: Question one

    With Anderson City Council set to consider an ambitious annexation plan Tuesday, questions abound about the short- and long-term impact of the plan abound. Key among them: What impact would annexation have on the Mallard Lake landfill?

    March 9, 2013 1 Photo

  • Aerial I 69, Exit 14-2.jpg Anderson annexation: Other key questions

    The City of Anderson is proposing to annex more than 20 square miles of property, most of it giving the city more access to Interstate 69 to the southwest and a smaller portion on the northeast side of the city. Here are answers to 19 other key questions.

    March 9, 2013 1 Photo

  • I 69 and SR 13 area biz.jpg Debate rages over Anderson’s proposed annexations

    “Anderson Fast Forward is the largest public policy proposal the city of Anderson has been engaged in since 1957,” Mayor Kevin Smith told The Herald Bulletin’s editorial board recently. He calls it a defining moment in charting the city’s future.

    March 9, 2013 1 Photo

Featured Ads
Annexation Video
More Resources from The Herald Bulletin
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide