The Herald Bulletin

Evening Update

Anderson Annexation

March 16, 2013

Council members: Annexation failure could foster cooperation

Mayor’s proposal seen as costly, divisive

ANDERSON, Ind. — In the end, there was probably little chance Mayor Kevin Smith’s expansive Anderson Fast Forward annexation proposals would be approved.

They were large, complex, costly and controversial from the outset.

The goal of Anderson Fast Forward, which Smith unveiled early last month, was to stabilize Anderson’s population and property tax base and create an economic development corridor by capturing unincorporated frontage along I-69 to the Madison/Hamilton County line.

Opposition to both proposals developed swiftly and was vocal. Faced with an angry crowd of opponents last month when it first considered the plans, the City Council tabled a vote to introduce the resolutions and fiscal plans that would have formally started the annexation process.

Thursday night, the City Council rejected both plans.

“I just didn’t feel it was in the best interests of the people of Anderson,” said Ollie Dixon, D-District 4.

“I didn’t want to get into stretching out into Lapel.”

And certainly the people who lived in Stoney Creek and Green Townships, didn’t want to be considered part of Anderson, a view that was pointedly expressed at two Anderson City Council sessions and public meetings in the affected southwest townships and in Lapel.

Dixon said he would have been able to support a much smaller and focused annexation, but was told there was no room for compromise. “We were told it was an all or nothing proposition,” Dixon said.

The proposed northeast annexation would have absorbed about four square miles in Union and Richland townships and added 2,900 to Anderson’s population, including 1,163 homes, five businesses and 25 miles of roads to the city.

The southwest annexation would have extended Anderson’s city limits to the Hamilton County line, positioning it to take advantage of commercial, industrial and residential growth moving north from Indianapolis, Fishers and Noblesville.

City Council President David Eicks, D-At Large, said he proposed a much smaller “strip” annexation from County Road 700 South to the county line as a way of capturing the economic development potential of Interstate 69.

He said Tax Increment Financing District money could be used to develop the roads and infrastructure to make that area more attractive to potential commercial and industrial developers.

He also believes the city could have worked more cooperatively with officials in both Pendleton and Lapel.

“I truly believe the governments need to sit down and work together to do what’s best for all the citizens of Madison County.”

Although property between Anderson and the county line is still largely rural, Eicks said, it won’t stay that way as growth and development continues to push north from Fishers and Noblesville.

“Do I see a lot more of that land being developed in the future? I certainly do,” Eicks said.

Eicks said that after the dust settles from the Anderson Fast Forward battle, leaders from Anderson, Pendleton and Lapel can meet to discuss mutually acceptable economic development options.

Find Stu Hirsch on Facebook and @StuHirsch on Twitter, or call 640-4861.

1
Text Only
Anderson Annexation
  • Pendleton holding annexation meeting

    A public meeting will be held Friday night in Pendleton to discuss possible annexation of land near exit 214 on I-69, making the town the fourth entity in the last year to express interest in the property.

    February 20, 2014

  • NWS - HB0208 - city annexation - JC 3.jpg Council majority shuns latest annexation discussion

    A special meeting of the City Council called by Mayor Kevin Smith to consider a revised annexation proposal failed for lack of a quorum Thursday, a result that may have ended the mayor's is effort to extend Anderson's boundaries down Interstate 69.

    June 21, 2013 1 Photo

  • Anderson mayor says southwest annexation back on the table Mayor Kevin Smith plans to resurrect the so-called southwest annexation that was part of an annexation plan rejected last winter by Anderson City Council.

    June 18, 2013

  • NWS - HB0222 - Lapel - JC 1.jpg Lapel officials move forward with super-voluntary annexation

    The Anderson City Council killed Anderson Fast Forward last month, but a proposed super-voluntary annexation designed to keep Anderson at bay is moving ahead.

    April 4, 2013 1 Photo

  • NWS - HB0315 - city council - 31 - DK.JPG Council members: Annexation failure could foster cooperation

    In the end, there was probably little chance Mayor Kevin Smith’s expansive Anderson Fast Forward annexation proposals would be approved. They were large, complex, costly and controversial from the outset. Thursday night, the City Council rejected both plans.

    March 16, 2013 1 Photo

  • NWS - HB0315 - city council - 31 - DK.JPG Council votes down annexation efforts

    The Anderson City Council on Thursday night rejected Mayor Kevin Smith’s Anderson Fast Forward Annexation proposals. The vote on the proposed northeast annexation was 7-2; the vote on the proposed southwest annexation was 6-3.

    March 14, 2013 3 Photos

  • NWS - HB0208 - city annexation - JC 1.jpg City Council could decide annexation questions tonight

    There has been a month of intense public discussion about Anderson Fast Forward, Mayor Kevin Smith’s proposal to annex nearly 21 square miles of new land into the city. Tonight, the question of how, or whether, to move forward with that plan once again falls on the shoulders of nine members of the Anderson City Council.

    March 13, 2013 1 Photo

  • William-Anderson---Stop-Dump-sign-3a-crop.jpg Anderson annexation: Question one

    With Anderson City Council set to consider an ambitious annexation plan Tuesday, questions abound about the short- and long-term impact of the plan abound. Key among them: What impact would annexation have on the Mallard Lake landfill?

    March 9, 2013 1 Photo

  • Aerial I 69, Exit 14-2.jpg Anderson annexation: Other key questions

    The City of Anderson is proposing to annex more than 20 square miles of property, most of it giving the city more access to Interstate 69 to the southwest and a smaller portion on the northeast side of the city. Here are answers to 19 other key questions.

    March 9, 2013 1 Photo

  • I 69 and SR 13 area biz.jpg Debate rages over Anderson’s proposed annexations

    “Anderson Fast Forward is the largest public policy proposal the city of Anderson has been engaged in since 1957,” Mayor Kevin Smith told The Herald Bulletin’s editorial board recently. He calls it a defining moment in charting the city’s future.

    March 9, 2013 1 Photo

Featured Ads
Annexation Video
More Resources from The Herald Bulletin
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide