The Herald Bulletin

Afternoon Update


June 20, 2014

'Big Joe' Clark: Has discretionary spending grown?

Economics are interesting measurements. In my opinion, sometimes economists try to compare apples to apples and other times apples to oranges. My question is, what happens when the math is right but the context of the measurement has changed? Not necessarily an entirely new fruit per se but changed enough to move the equations relevance.

Discretionary income is the amount of money that a person has at the end of each month not already obligated by normal expenses. In other words, the expenditures are by choice and technically for non-essential items. This is true in the federal budget and true in each of our households.

Naturally when younger families are formed, the amount of their discretionary income tends to be less than in future years. Oddly enough, individuals under 25 years of age tend to have the highest amount of discretionary income because many still live with their parents and have few essential obligations, according to research conducted by Career Builder.

One challenge that financial analysts and economists are wrestling with is that the amount of discretionary income for the average American has not changed over the last 20 years. In other words, we are continuing to work, retirement accounts are growing and yet economic statistics say we have shown no real growth. These are the things that make me scratch my head and ponder. Are we missing something in the translation? I think the answer is yes.

We have discussed before that the economy is made up of various moving parts. Our gross domestic product (GDP), which is a way economists measure the growth of a country’s economy, is created by consumers, government and businesses. There are many moving parts, and the ability to measure and track it is astounding to me.

When we look at the stock market, however, many believe that what matters the most is the change in earnings relative to a company's past growth. Not where it has been or where it is currently, but rather the rate of change between the measurements. We call this trajectory and it can be positive, which is typically great for the stock if things are improving. The trajectory can be flat or negative, which is often problematic for the stock price regardless of the profitability or stability of the underlying company.

Text Only
Featured Ads
More Resources from The Herald Bulletin
AP Video
Japan Landslide Rescuers Struggle in Heavy Rain Raw: Severe Floods, Fire Wrecks Indiana Homes Endangered Red Wolves Face Uncertain Future Raw: Russian Aid Convoy Arrives in Ukraine Hamm Talks Emmy Chances Okla. Policeman Accused of Sex Assaults on Duty Raw: Egypt Bus Crash Kills at Least 33 Two Bodies Found in Adjacent Yards Dominican Republic Bans Miley Cyrus Concert Raw: Israeli Air Strike in Gaza Raw: Rescue Efforts Suspended at Japan Landslide Raw: Bodies of MH17 Victims Arrive in Malaysia Raw: Smaller Marches in Ferguson Attorney: Utah Eatery Had Other Chemical Burn Farm Resurgence Grows With Younger Crowd Microbrewery Chooses Special Can for Its Beer Ky. Firefighters Hurt in Ice Bucket Challenge Federal Investigation Will Look at Use of Force Community Deals With Michael Brown Aftermath US: We Do Not Pay Ransom to Terrorists

Click HERE to read all your Parade favorites including Hollywood Wire, Celebrity interviews and photo galleries, Food recipes and cooking tips, Games and lots more.
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Helium debate
Front page

Generally speaking, how good are relations among people of different races in the Anderson area?

Very good
Very bad
     View Results