The Herald Bulletin

Evening Update


November 19, 2013

Editorial: Nance case shows need to communicate


But the jury discerned that Nance was the city’s biggest parks supporter. Residents knew it too; at least 30 in the courtroom applauded when the verdict came through.

Nance filed a tort claim against Arnold, claiming Nance’s reputation and character was damaged. He requested $300,000 in compensation for what he calls a “politically motivated and retaliatory suspension and firing” by Arnold.

Whether the political allegations are true or not, this was likely a scenario that could have been avoided if a city parks superintendent had properly documented funds, and if a city administration had talked honestly to a dedicated employee.

In summary A courtroom experience involving the former Elwood parks superintendent could have been avoided if two sides had talked.

Text Only
More Resources from The Herald Bulletin
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Do you plan to attend one of the public sessions about the Mounds Lake reservoir project?

Not sure yet
     View Results