The Herald Bulletin

Morning Update


February 6, 2013

Viewpoint: Arguments of 2013 much the same in 1938’s ‘New Guns for Old’ article

Just for a few minutes let’s look back in American history. Can homicides really be reduced with more gun laws and restrictions?

January 1938, The Commentator magazine, edited by Lowell Thomas, included an article by Homer Cummings titled “New Guns for Old.” 75 years ago. During that time the attorney general proposed a better registration system as the first step toward disarming the “underworld” and “mobsters.”

The writer discusses how a judge never thought he needed a pistol until threatened by a criminal soon to be released from prison. Here in America, the judge said, it never occurred to him to have a permit to purchase a revolver to protect himself. “In Canada only three out of 10 homicides were by guns. In America nearly seven out of 10 homicides were caused by firearms. Handgun permits were required in Canada,” Cummings wrote.

Cummings continues to discuss how the “underworld” traffic in firearms reached appalling dimensions. State laws that prohibited the carrying of concealed weapons had not been affective. “It is important to understand at the outset that federal action is not and should not be exclusive. It is limited and auxiliary for regulating commerce,” he said.

In 1921, Colt Patent Firearms Manufacturing Co. created 15,000 sub-machine guns. Over 6,000 were sold in the open market and not to the military. In the spring of 1934 the National Firearms Act began to take some action toward the “Tommy” gun. But, the control didn’t really affect the “gangster onslaught of violence.” In 1936 a bank robbery investigation netted two rifles, two shotguns, nine pistols, one revolver and one machine gun. Cummings comments, “It is folly to compel the registration of a short-barrel shotgun and at the same time exempt the modern high-powered rifles and revolvers.”

Cummings goes on to discuss how he urged Congress to adopt a measure which would extend the National Firearms act to include “all firearms.” Everyone must register any type of firearm and  give extensive identification and pay a tax. “No honest man can object. Show me the man who doesn’t want his gun registered and I will show you a man who shouldn’t have a gun.” Many would disagree.

There are now millions of guns in America. Purchases at various open markets and gun shows reflect some control while gun shop owners follow FFL and ATF rules. Many good gun owners for valid reasons do not want to register their weapons for fear of confiscation by the government or undue controls violating the Second Amendment.

Cummings ends his article of 1938 with the following paragraph. “These measures of registration will “be branded as a nuisance. It involves less red tape than securing an automobile license. We have a homicide rate in this country which runs annually between 11,000 and 12,000 victims a year. Almost 70 percent  of these deaths are due to firearms. Considering these facts, the “nuisance” argument has an empty sound, cites Cummings.

This article of 1938 sounds much too similar to today’s arguments. As a Vietnam veteran, I support the Second Amendment and the right to own and bear arms.  

While many people do not object to increased background checks and some limitations on weapons, most do not want changes. Can we really stop the criminal mind? The insane? Do we really think we can identify and collect all the types of weapons from the mentally ill?

They didn’t have violent video games and extremely violent graphic films then. While the movie industry  supports heavy restrictions on guns, they continue to want it both ways.

Let’s not forget that on May 18, 1927, in Bath, Mich., a part-time caretaker blew up a school killing 38 children, seven adults, himself and wounded 58 others. No guns were involved.

Many very good laws, both state and federal, exist and are enforced regarding weapons.

As Thomas Jefferson once said, “Those that sacrifice freedom for safety, deserve neither.” One thing is for sure, steps must be taken to protect our schools and reduce gun violence. I hope it’s possible.

Text Only
  • Viewpoint: Adding such a robust water resource with Mounds Lake would set us apart I have lived in Madison County most of my life, and for the past 14 years, I served on the Town Council in Pendleton, recently retiring as president. I have watched with great interest the happenings around the proposed Mounds Mall for a few reasons.

    July 26, 2014

  • Letter: Dr. David and Kay Mares are local treasures Throughout history we have had treasures that were not appreciated until years or centuries after their time. The lost art of Angkor Wat in Cambodia. The terra cotta men of China. Vincent Van Gogh was a failing, starving artist in his time. Now his works are some of the world’s most valued. Madison County has a prize of its own that should be recognized in its time.

    July 24, 2014

  • Letter: Reservoir promotion has circus approach P.T. Barnum is starting his tour to promote the reservoir by going to all the towns surrounding the dream. Rob Sparks is this town's P.T. Barnum.

    July 24, 2014

  • Letter: Repentance is key to surviving times What happens to a nation that refuses to repent before God? What happens to a nation that had strong Christian beginnings, but now more closely resembles Sodom and Gomorrah?

    July 24, 2014

  • Letter: Anderson's annexed areas still lack business On July 10, 2014, at the Anderson City Council meeting, the executor of the estate was shut off from speaking, because she did not live in Adams Township, and the person from Adams Township tried to get up and speak was not allowed to. The council rushed the vote for zoning the land for business.

    July 22, 2014

  • Letter: Birth control, abortion should be woman's choice Why are Republicans so gung-ho on restricting birth control and abortion? That's easy. Republican legislators are so unpopular because they don't legislate and literally block all bills that would help the middle and lower income classes.

    July 22, 2014

  • Bannon, Tom Viewpoint: Paramount is an investment that is paying dividends About 25 years ago the citizens of Anderson made a decision that would have a long lasting impact on the community. Instead of saving the old Paramount Theatre, which had fallen into serious disrepair, it was decided that the easy and prudent decision was to get rid of the building to create additional downtown parking. Shortly after the Paramount came down, the community got rid of another abandoned structure when the old Carnegie Building, which was the former home of the Anderson Public Library, was torn down.

    July 21, 2014 1 Photo

  • Letter: Wall Street should not be in politics Talk about corruption, ponzi schemes, we're looking at you, Wall Street, controlling the prices of our food, gasoline and clothing we must buy and about every company in America — while trashing President Obama, the Affordable Health Care Plan, along with every Democrat, to influence our elections, at the same time.

    July 17, 2014

  • Letter: 23 Relay for Life teams raised $40,000 As chairs of this year's American Cancer Society Relay For Life of Madison County, we would like to thank everyone for their generosity and support.

    July 17, 2014

  • Letter: Ritz under attack by state education board I attended the Indiana State Board of Education meeting in Indianapolis on Wednesday, July 9, and was genuinely disturbed by what I saw.

    July 17, 2014

More Resources from The Herald Bulletin
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide