subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Sun, Jul 05 2009 
Breaking News:  Update: Ex-NFL QB McNair killed in Tenn.  July 04, 2009 05:32 pm

Resources

print this story   Print this story
  Post to del.icio.us

Published June 25, 2008 08:28 pm - ANDERSON — A local state representative is asking the Indiana Attorney General to appeal a federal judge’s decision that struck down a new state law allowing computer searches of sex offenders.

Reske seeks appeal on struck-down law


The Herald Bulletin

ANDERSON — A local state representative is asking the Indiana Attorney General to appeal a federal judge’s decision that struck down a new state law allowing computer searches of sex offenders.

An appeal would help provide better wording so that the law could again go through the Legislature, said state Rep. Scott Reske, D-Pendleton.

“We need to aggressively go after these people who commit these crimes,” Reske said Wednesday.

“If we lose the appeal, we’ll use what we learn ... and go back and try to restructure the language in the next session so that we’ll be within those boundaries.”

Reske, as chairman of the House Technology, Research and Development Committee, included language in the bill that would have required sex offenders enrolling in the state’s public registry to submit their computer e-mail addresses and user names.

Those names allow computer users access to instant messaging, chat room and social network sites.

The sex offenders would have to sign a consent form allowing searches of their computers or other Internet-enabled devices at any time. They would also have to install software — at their expense — that would monitor their Internet activity.

However, the American Civil Liberties Union challenged the law, set to go into effect July 1, on privacy grounds for sex offenders who must still register but have finished serving parole or probation.

U.S. District Judge David Hamilton agreed with their claims.

“The unprecedented new law, however well-intentioned, violates the Fourth Amendment rights of the plaintiff class, who have completed their sentences and are no longer on probation, parole or any other kind of court supervision,” Hamilton wrote in a 51-page ruling.

“The state may not force them to waive those rights under threat of criminal prosecution for failing or refusing to do so,” the ruling said.

The wording, Reske said, was based on information received by his committee from technology companies, including Microsoft. Indiana was the first state to pass a law based on the comments from those companies.

State Sen. John Waterman, R-Shelburn, sponsored the bill, which originally did not address sex offenders.

Reske’s committee later inserted provisions including the computer issue.

Sex offenders generally must be actively registered for 10 years after their release from prison, but some face the restriction for life.



print this story    email this story    comment on this story   

Click to discuss this story with other readers on our forums.

Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.
Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.




Zillow
monster
autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide

Sign up for Herald Bulletin
Email & Text Alerts







Premier Guide
Find a job! Find a Home! Find a car!


 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index